Living in myself

L

ast weekend I took part in a Embodied-Relational Therapy (ERT) course in Hebden Bridge, run by Jayne Johnson and Nick Totton. It was brilliant, and I learnt a lot, both in terms of my work and myself. ERT looks at (1) humans as embodied beings: we are not brains inhabiting robotic bodies which our brains give life to. Rather, we are the collection of our physical body and mind. We cannot live one without the other. Again, that cartesian split has a lot to answer for in giving us this false divide. ERT also says that (2) we are born hard-wired to relate to others, and that this is evidenced from the moment that we are born: we seek relationship instantly. To bring the two aspects together: we relate to others (both human and non-human) through our whole body, and relating is not simply a connection of minds/brains. This is only my simplified understanding of ERT at the moment, but Nick Totton is bringing out a book soon!

So, early on the morning of the second day of the workshop, I went for a walk with the dog and a thought came to me. I often talk about my physical health problems in the third person. So, I might say "my neck and shoulders are aching" or I might think "Come on legs, I need to run faster!", as if I am trying to command a separate being. Yet, I wonder if it makes more sense to replace "my legs" with "me", and thus own these aches, pains and discomforts. For example,  when running I need to say "Come on Luke, I need to run faster", as all of me is involved in this process, not simply my legs. If I am a whole being, commanding one part of myself to do something is ludicrous! While this is a very trite example, it demonstrates how we disassociate parts of ourselves (my legs, in this case), rather than being fully integrated.

I look at our dog and cats, and they appear to be fully embodied. What their bodies/they want to do, they do. There appears to be none of this forcing one part of themselves to do something when it does not want to. They do not appear to force themselves to eat if they are not hungry, nor to sleep when they do not want to. Meanwhile, I force myself to run further, even though I feel exhausted, and to sleep because it is nighttime even though I am not tired.

This may come across as mere semantics. However, I believe that changing the way in which we interact with ourselves (including our bodies) involves changing the way in which we see ourselves. A change in semantics paves the way for a change in the way we see and treat ourselves. If we see ourselves as embodied, unified beings (i.e. "This body is a part of me, just as much as my personality is"), we can then hear what our bodies are telling us, instead of ignoring it, or fighting against it, and causing ourselves more harm.

Fog

W

e have lived in fog for a week. Living at around 900 feet above sea level has its benefits, and its downsides. Living in a cloud for 7 days was one of those downsides. 

Mostly this difficulty is emotional. I need to be able to see the landscape around me on a emotional level. We lived in the city for ten years, where the furtherest I could see was the other side of the street. We moved to the hills to be able to see further than thirty yards, but being stuck in cloud meant that I could only see thirty to fifty yards again, and it felt oppressive. 

I woke up on Saturday morning, and the cloud had lifted! My mood did as well. And yesterday evening had a clarity and stillness that I cannot describe in words. The roe and rabbits were feeding in the field. The curlews were hovering around the house. A rainbow sprung from the ground, and the setting sun cast an orange hue to the land.

IMG_3081.JPG

So, right now its chucking it down, but at least I can see the other side of the valley! There is clarity and I no longer feel hemmed in by the weather. 

We are evolved animals, and we evolved within Nature. Nature must affect us, as we affect it. Hence, the weather conditions affect us, and our moods. I don't know why, but they do.

Body vs. Mind or Body and Mind?

B

loody Descartes and his mind-body split! The problems that have arisen from the idea of dualism are huge. More and more I am coming round to the idea that we are not made up of three separate entities: mind, body and soul, as Descartes proposed in the 17th Century. Rather, that we are mind and body (and soul?). We are 'embodied' people. We are made up of brain, heart, lungs, legs, hair and so on, as one complete whole. Our bodies are not simply robots which we inhabit with our minds. We are whole beings, each organ and part relying on all the others. Because of this oneness of mind and body, our bodies give us signals about our lives if we listen to them.

As an example, I am aware that my psoriasis is linked with stress in my life. I also know, on a biological level, that it is the result of skin cells over-producing skin. I have been given treatment for the symptoms (dry patches of skin) in the form of a steroidal cream. It works for the time that I use the cream. As soon as I stop, the psoriasis returns. When I go on holiday, and allow myself to relax, the psoriasis reduces.

So my body gives feedback signals to the whole in the form of psoriasis. If I listen to that feedback and reduce my stress, the psoriasis reduces, and hence my body no longer needs to send out these warning signals. This same feedback between body and mind can be seen when we feel anxiety as butterflies in our stomach. It is often the case that my body knows how I feel about a situation before I am aware of it. I enter a situation, and slowly become aware of the nerves in my stomach, sweaty palms and dry mouth: "Oh, I must be feeling anxious about this situation!" I say. I feel annoyed that it takes me so long to recognise this and yet my body knows, if only I listen to it. I am drawn to a comment made by Gendlin (2003) in his book on Focusing.

It would appear that my body knows me better than I do! Maybe I should listen to it more. It is, after all, part of me. Or rather, it is me.

References

Gendlin, E (2003): Focusing: how to gain direct access to your body's knowledge; RIder Books.